Discrimination by politicians against religious minorities: Experimental evidence from the UK

State Religion and Discrimination Against Ethnic Minorities

When Do Voters Punish Corrupt Politicians? Experimental Evidence from Brazil

While there is a vast literature about the consequences of corruption, research focused on the causes of non-corrupt governments is still nascent. Electoral accountability is one important means of changing existing corruption dynamics in government, and one potential way of punishing corrupt elected officials is to give voters information about the corrupt behavior. In a randomized field exper...

Discrimination: Experimental Evidence from Psychology and Economics

Religious Minorities and Provision of Public Goods: Evidence from Rural West Bengal

Religious Minorities and Provision of Public Goods: Evidence from Rural West Bengal Religious and ethnic minorities across the world face partisan treatment with regard to provision of public goods, either as outcome of discriminatory practices or due to historical antecedents, such as the caste and religious divides in India. In several districts of West Bengal in India concentration of religi...

Risk Preferences and Misconduct: Evidence from Politicians

When seeking new leaders, business and government organizations alike often need individuals that are less risk averse, or even risk-seeking, in order to improve performance. However, individuals amenable to increased risktaking may be more likely to engage in misconduct. To study this issue, we explore US political scandals and the implicated politicians’portfolio choices. We find that a polit...